When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the D Building Parking Fees Settlement Lawsuit managed by the Victim C located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si on January 23, 2015, the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant reported the 112 declaration; and (d) the Defendant was driving.

The F vehicle damaged the victim's property by fasting the parking blocking machine of the amount of 250,000 won at hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act regarding the crime (the defendant was in a state of mental, physical, or mental loss due to yellow disorder at the time of committing the crime in this case

However, in light of the background, method, details of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s conduct before and after the instant crime, it is difficult to deem that the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things at the time and make decisions.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;