건설장비임대료
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as stated in the part of the facts acknowledged under Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, this part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the parties’ assertion argues that the Plaintiff did not receive KRW 87,160,00 for construction machinery rent used at the site of the instant sewage culvert maintenance work (the fourth-minute), and that the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the said KRW 87,160,000 and the damages for delay thereof, and that the money the Defendant claimed to the Plaintiff was the construction machinery rent used at the third construction site.
In regard to this, the Defendant asserts that, with respect to the fourth-minute construction work, the unpaid balance written as if the Defendant had remaining KRW 87,160,000, out of the construction machinery rent to be paid to the Plaintiff, the subcontract termination statement is only necessary for the Plaintiff to file a lawsuit against the Domin Integrated Construction, and that, in fact, the monthly rent of dump truck is 4.5 million won for the third-minute truck, 5 million won for 23 to 25 days, 5 million won for 196,000 won for 217,000 won for 25 days, multiplied by the number of days used for 196,00 won for 25 days for 25 days for more than 25 days, 25 million won for 3rd and 4.5 million won for 205 million won for 3rd and 5 million won for 25 million won for 25 days for 3rd and 4.5 million won for 4 million won for 5 million won for 7 years for 5 million won or more (205 million won for ).
(b) judgment 1 disposition documents;