When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 1, 2014, the Defendant, as a debt collector who lent KRW 2.5 million to the obligor B, requested that the debt collector agreed to repay the debt by October 5, 2014, extend the due date, and used the “D” for the “B” in the management of the Cheongi-gu Seoul Metropolitan City C and the 2nd floor Defendant to “D” as follows.

Around 22:00 on October 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received B’s mobile phone (a) stating that “I want to kill the baby; (b) I want to do so; (c) I want to do so; and (d) I want to use money within 2 hours at present; (d) I would am out of B; and (e) I would make I am to use money within 2 hours; and (e) I am in singing again; and (e) at around 00:20 following the following day, I asked “I am equal to this son,” and (c) I would have the cellular phone before I bring money (the written indictment is recognized as “I am back, but as above,” but it is not possible to bring money. Although I paid a fine several times, I would not refuse to do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Record of recording and gathering, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of two copies of judgment;

1. Article 15 (1) of the Act on the Fair Debt Collection Practices and Articles 15 (1) and 9 subparagraph 1 of the same Article concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;