However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On April 30, 2013, the Defendant filed an application for a general loan with the victim, while making a false statement on the part of the employee in charge of the loan, stating that “A loan of KRW 350,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

However, the fact is that the defendant has already been liable for the amount of KRW 2.2 billion, and it is difficult to bear interest due to the burden of interest of KRW 10,000,000 per month, and when the defendant has been in excess of KRW 3.80,000,000, the DNA gas station operated by the defendant was no longer supplied with oil, and when the defendant was imposed a penalty surcharge of KRW 100,000,00,000 due to the sale of the cargo loaded around June 22, 2012, the administrative disposition was changed due to the disposition of the suspension of business on the cargo loaded around November 22, 2012, and the suspension of business on the D gas station was anticipated to be operated normally. In the case of EMel operated by the defendant, most of the profits were used for repayment of loans to other lending enterprises. In the case of detached housing with the right to preferential reimbursement of the Fur population offered as security, the tenant has resided in the apartment, and there was no intention or ability to receive interest from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, obtained 350 million won from the victim as a loan in the same place, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A complaint;