If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant was dismissed from the same representative on the front corridor No. 110 Dong-dong 902, the victim D (the remaining and the age of 61) on October 20, 2015, on the ground that the Defendant was dismissed from the same representative on the ground that he was discharged from the same representative on the front corridor No. 110, 902, and on the ground that he was discharged from the same representative, the Defendant was sprinked with the face part of the victim, with the head, and the sprinked part of the sponsed part once,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as at the third public trial date);

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Video Cd;

1. The defendant asserts that he did not inflict any injury on the victim.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable since it sufficiently recognizes the fact that the defendant inflicted bodily injury upon the victim ( further, the defendant asserted that he was only fulbat of the victim, and that he did not do so, and that he did not have any physical harm on the video as stated in the judgment of the victim, and that he did not have any physical harm on the video as stated in the video as presented by the victim. The application of the law

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.