beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고단1949

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes related to the issuance of cards;

A. On December 11, 2017, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) based on the card recruiter’s credit card recruiter’s identity known to the victim C’s personal information; (b) based on the written application form for personal card membership at the new card pre-user’s office located in 29, Jinjin-gu, Seoul; and (c) signed “C” in the cell phone name column, “E” in the cell phone name column, “E” in the cell phone name column, “C” in the cell phone name column, “C” and “C” in the workplace name column; and (d) signed “C” in the name adjacent thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the victim C’s new personal member application form, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as mentioned in the above paragraph (a), issued an application for subscription to a forged card and exercised it as if it were duly formed to the employee in charge of the card company who was unaware of the forgery.

(c)

The Defendant, like the foregoing A and B, applied for the issuance of a new credit card in the name of C by deceiving C with the victim’s new credit card as if C applied for the issuance of the credit card, and was issued on December 15, 2017 by receiving one copy of the said credit card (the card number:H) from the card delivery agent in the name-free Gu Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 15, 2017.

2. Crimes related to the use of cards;

A. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) purchased books equivalent to KRW 1 million at the market price by deceiving the business owner as if he/she had a genuine right to use the credit cards listed in the said paragraph 1-C; and (b) acquired pecuniary profits equivalent to the said amount by settling the accounts with the said credit card.

B. The Defendant’s use of a private document forgery and a falsified investigation document is the credit card at the time and place specified in the above 2-A.