2. Although there are circumstances such as the fact that the total amount of damage caused by the instant crime is relatively more than the total amount of damage, the defendant recovered from damage to some victims in an investigative agency and a trial, the victims expressed their intention not to punish the defendant, and certain damaged items were returned to the victims, the defendant committed several larceny crimes, the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim H, the defendant was committed in the past, and the defendant was committed again during the repeated crime period, and the defendant again committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period, even in around 2017, after being sentenced to a fine or suspended indictment, and even after being sentenced to a suspension of indictment, it again led to the instant crime, and in light of all circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, motive, means, results, etc., the defendant's punishment cannot be accepted, and thus, the defendant's assertion that the court below's sentence is unfair, is not acceptable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.