Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On August 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of interference with business at the Seoul Southern District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 6, 2014.

On February 20, 2014, around 20:13, the Defendant was provided with a taxi fee of KRW 4,900 by having the Plaintiff operate the taxi fee up to the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government P, the destination of which is a destination, even if he/she was on a taxi in front of the additional 2nd apartment in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A criminal investigation report (to hear statements at the time of the other party to the victim);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports on criminal records, report on the results of confirmation before disposition, copies of judgment bound in the public trial records, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of case search;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;