On January 19, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on May 14, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence.

1. On July 5, 2014, around 15:50, the Defendant: (a) opened a car driver’s seat in Eteack, which was parked on the road in front of the city of Cheongju, and used cash 5,000 won owned by the victim while keeping the car for the said car; and (b) stolen it.

2. On July 5, 2014, at around 15:53, the Defendant opened a senior string of Gysteta taxi cab owned by the victim F and used one wall, one modern card, one national card, one new card, one driver’s license, one driver’s license, one cash 80,000 won (20 won per day, 12 pages) in the market price owned by the victim, which was located in the string of the taxi string.

3. At around 16:00 on September 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with one “contributor” of the victim’s market value equivalent to KRW 15,000 owned by the victim, which was suffering from the front display stand, at a model store operated by the victim I in a considerable district of Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of examination of the accused on behalf of the prosecutor;

1. Each statement of D, F, and I;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs, etc. of damaged vehicles, photographs of seized objects, photographs of crimes, and photographs of damaged objects;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records, replys to criminal records, investigation reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant had committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same criminal act, and was punished as a fine even before each of the crimes of this case was committed.

with respect to victim I.