2. The judgment of the court is recognized that the defendant has committed a crime in this case during the period of detention for about two months, he/she has no criminal record of the same kind, and that the defendant led to confession prior to the confirmation of a suspected case, and thus has no influence on the result of the trial. Such crime in this case requires punishment corresponding to the criminal liability, which is a serious crime that interferes with the trial of the court for the discovery of substantial truth and causes confusion and in confidence in the judicial action of the State. The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on April 19, 2012, even after the execution of the above punishment was completed on October 19, 2012, he/she committed a repeated crime in this case during the period of detention, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for one year on November 22, 2012, and was given a false testimony to protect a person who has joined the criminal organization as he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for more than two years, and the defendant's motive and reason for the suspended of execution are not.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.