2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. (1) The defendant is the wife of F (1937, 1937, 4 October 1996) and G (1936).

(2) The Plaintiffs are F and G’s father and the Defendant’s mother.

In addition, F is there is I (Death on October 14, 2010) and J with children employed by F in conjunction with other women.

(3) The plaintiffs' conciliation division is K (1909 students, death of October 10, 1986) and L (1885 students, death of October 1, 1946).

B. (1) The G of registration of land in the name of G is based on the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 4502, Act No. 7500, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Special Measures Act”), and the list 1 through 6, 8, and 9 of the attached Table (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “each of the instant lands,” and the individual land is referred to as “each of the instant lands,” instead of “each,” and the registration of ownership transfer or registration of ownership is completed as follows.

The registration of ownership is completed on July 10, 198, July 10, 198, 1978, Act No. 4502 of Jun. 15, 1978, which was based on the registration date of the former registered titleholder, 1 L 1 L 1 L 1 of the Act on the Registration Date of the former registered titleholder, and (a) on the land of this case from G 1 of Oct. 12, 1992 to the defendant before the registration date of the defendant on Oct. 14, 200; and (b) on the land of this case from August 21, 2000 to 61 of the same month, the registration of ownership transfer is completed on July 10, 208, 208; and (c) on the land of this case, the land of this case was completed on Oct. 21, 200; and

9. He shall complete the registration of transfer of ownership by sale.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 16, 21, fact-finding with respect to the head of the M/Dong in this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiffs' assertion (1) Each land of this case, which was owned by L with the plaintiffs' evidence L, was inherited to referring F via K with the Chok.

(2) As F dies, each of the instant lands was killed after F’s death, as seen earlier after deducting 3/15 and I died from her wife G, and as such, I died after F’s death. Therefore, the Plaintiffs’ assertion is the same.