However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BR-V 4WD car.

On March 29, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol 0.141% during blood transfusions on 01:29, and set it on two-lanes to the road immediately preceding the long distance of each source in Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-gu, Gyeong-dong, and reported that the electric signal, etc. is changed to the right-hand and left-hand signal, the Defendant changed the course to the right-hand turn and proceeded to the right-hand turn.

At the same time, the passage of the vehicle is near the intersection in which the passage of the vehicle is frequent, and since the time is night, the driver of the vehicle has the duty of care to give notice of change of course by operating the direction, etc. when changing the vehicle, and to prevent the accident by changing the vehicle line in the direction of direction, etc. and keeping the traffic situation of the front and rear.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in neglecting this so under the influence of alcohol and changing the line to the left-hand side, and at this time, the victim C (25 tax) who started from the same direction after being set at the first lane of the same direction, and was placed in the front right-hand side of the motor vehicle of the defendant, with the front wheels of the motor vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to destroy and damage the said victim’s hurfed vehicle to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 780,000, such as the repair cost for the hurf exchange with the hurf of the said victim’s vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence. The Defendant continued to flee, while looking back at the mar section at the entrance of the Sungju-gun-gun, the hurb of the Daegu National Land Maintenance and Construction Office located in the Sungju-gun-gun-gun-gun-si to the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and did not take necessary measures to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 840,00,000 for the hurf repair

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, inquiry of the results of the control of drinking driving, and report on internal accidents (the said mark);

1. Written estimate;

1. Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident photographs;