However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 4, 2017, at around 20:15, the Defendant: (a) reported to the effect that “A victim C, a police officer belonging to the police unit B police unit located in the Seocho-gu Police Station B police station of the Seodaemun-gu, which was sent to the police station, is to bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son, son son,” and (b) reported to the effect that “A victim D, who is the police officer of the police station, is to bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son, son son, and son son, is to live immediately,” and that the victim D, who is a police officer, is to live.

D. Before 201, C expressed the desire to the effect that “C” was “C,” and the victims were re-convened to the effect that the victims were “hind, grow.”

As a result, the Defendant abused victims openly while they observe E, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place, and at the same time, took a bath for returning home from C by the police officer C, and flapsed and shakes his flaps.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A complaint filed by C or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The crime of probation under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is deemed to have been committed by a police officer who is performing official duties while under the influence of alcohol despite the number of times of assault and other force, but is not likely to be committed by assault and assault. However, it is deemed that the crime is recognized, against whom it is committed, and that it is not committed again with alcohol treatment.

In consideration of the fact at issue, the punishment shall be determined as per the order.