2. In light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, Defendant’s age, and sexual conduct, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if it takes into account equity with the case of a final and conclusive judgment at the same time as the case of a crime of fraud, even though it was agreed with the victim on the part of the theft of cash, repeated crimes during the period of repeated crimes, the fact that there were several times in a short period, the history of punishment for the larceny of the same law, and repayment of additional damages or failure to obtain a letter from the injured party, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.