Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) occurred between B and C on May 29, 2012 due to parking problems. In the process, the Plaintiff reported to the Busan, 00 U.S. Police Station on the ground of assault and bathing, etc. from B and C.

Therefore, police officers D and E dispatched the above police station, but there was no good appraisal and prejudice against the plaintiff and the plaintiff's family members, and the police officers filed a request for a summary trial without any particular evidence, and conducted an illegal act by manipulating the date and time of the violation, and preparing a false investigation report that the plaintiff refused to affix seals, as well as by failing to give any notice of the alleged facts or voluntary behavior while driving the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff was indicted for violating the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act according to the above illegal performance of official duties, but the judgment of not guilty became final and conclusive.

(1) The police officers of the 2,000 U.S. police station, who had been living in the lower floor of the Plaintiff’s house and experienced conflicts with the Plaintiff, revealing the Plaintiff’s confidential information on official duties, such as referring to the fact that the Plaintiff made an administration or petition to the police.

(2) If the Plaintiff filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission on the ground of the aforementioned unlawful act, and two police officers belonging to the Busan High Police Station were subject to disciplinary action, the police officers of the Busan High Police Station from July 15, 2012 to July 16, 2012, while the Plaintiff had been engaged in a malicious appraisal on it, the police officers of the Busan High Police Station did not conduct any investigation on it, even though the Plaintiff had resided in the Plaintiff’s office in the first floor located in the Plaintiff’s domicile in Bupyeong-si and in the first floor located in the Plaintiff’s workplace in Seocheon-si and in the second floor located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Plaintiff reported the damage caused by the Plaintiff’s loss caused by the Plaintiff’s car broken out

(3) In accordance with paragraph (4), the defendant shall be the plaintiff.