교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 22, 2014, at around 19:20 on September 2, 2014, the Defendant driven B stringing a while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.110% of the blood alcohol concentration, without obtaining a driver’s license, at the 1km section from the front of a cafeteria in the trade name in the Domnam-gun, Masung-gun, a Domnam-gun, to the front of the volcanic third street in the same Dom.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving cars B.
The Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for the temporary border as stated in paragraph (1) above, driven the said car while under the influence of approximately 0.110% of alcohol concentration in blood, and led the Defendant to drive the said car in the direction of the screen on the surface of the cryp of volcanic three-lane in front of the volcanic three-lane in the Masan-gun, Masan-gun.
Since the traffic control of police officers is carried out due to the malfunction of traffic signal apparatus, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol without a license, was negligent in entering the above volcanic ginseng intersection by failing to make a left-hand turn while neglecting the police officer’s stop signal, and received the front part of the victim C(the age of 26)’s driving Doz car, which was driven by the victim C(the age of 26)’s driving in accordance with the direction to the high-Eup Myeon in the Chang-si Do.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (the 26 years of age) by the aforementioned occupational negligence, such as the increase of collision between the right satisfaction and the right satisfaction for about 12 weeks, from the victim E (the 26 years of age) who is a passenger of the said E-car.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. C.