Defendant

A 208,050,000 won from Defendant B and 229,600.

As a punishment, the Defendants were willing to receive money and valuables under the pretext of receiving money and valuables from the J, the president of the hospital employed by the Defendant A, and from K to the investigators of the Gwangju District District Public Prosecutor's Office, who had been in charge of investigating the case, such as violation of the Medical Service Act against J, etc.

Defendants were investigated by the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office at the house of Jeonjin-gu, Jeonjin-gu, 101 Dong-gu, J. 712 for the above case on September 2016.

J and its ASEAN constituted a special investigation team in the Gwangju District Public Prosecutors' Office as the above case.

Hh is under investigation upon request of the investigator in charge of the instant case through the investigator, and is under investigation by requesting the investigator in charge of the instant case to pay a fine only if the suspicion is difficult.” On September 12, 2016, the N Hospital parking lot located in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in YY-gu, Jeonju-si and received cash KRW 200 million from K as a solicitation of the investigator in charge, and was issued five times in total from August 31, 2016 to October 11, 2016 to receive KRW 52,3650,000 from K for five times under the same name.

As a result, the Defendants received money and valuables in collusion for soliciting or arranging the cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each police statement protocol against J and K (Evidence Nos. 1, 10);

1. Application of each statute on financial transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 111(1) of the Judicial Code of the Protection of Criminal Records and the Selection of Punishment, Article 30 of the Criminal Code, and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 116 of the Criminal Procedure Act (see, e.g., the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the Defendants, and the relevant investigation report, and the case against theO, etc. among the money used by Defendant B, including accomplices, continues to exist under this Court order 2017 senior 792.

The reason for sentencing, except 86,00,000 won, which has been delivered to the person, is the penalty.