사기
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The Defendant subscribed to the number fraternity operated by the victim C, and brought a mind that the Defendant would not pay the money after paying the money.
The Defendant began on March 7, 2012 among the numbers of the victim's extension, and the member made two times at the intervals of 13,15 days, and the member made 8,50,000 won payment, and the amount of the guidance was 10,000 won at the office of the victim of the D building in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 7, 2012, and the victim made the amount of KRW 10,000,000 from the office of the victim of the D building in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 7, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that "the opening of a false sales store is required to pay the money at once."
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the paid money in good faith even if the defendant did not pay the paid money in good faith by yielding No. 1 of the victim.
Nevertheless, the defendant was given 10 million won from the victim, i.e., he was given 10 million won as a guidance.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
B. The Defendant began on March 7, 2012 among the numbers of the victim’s mooring lines, and concluded that “on March 7, 2012, 11 members shall pay KRW 1 million on the day of every week, and on March 7, 2012, at the office of the victim of the D building in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the victim purchased KRW 10 million on March 7, 2012 at the office of the victim of the D building in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and that “on March 7, 2012, it is necessary to pay money to the victim by bringing a misunderstanding into the wrong sales store.” On the one hand, the Defendant made a false statement that “on time, the payment will be made.”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the paid money in good faith even if the defendant did not pay the paid money in good faith by yielding No. 1 of the victim.
Nevertheless, the defendant was given 10 million won from the victim, i.e., he was given 10 million won as a guidance.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. The Defendant and his defense counsel, and the Defendant’s defense counsel on December 201.