추심금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is reasonable, except for the following portions of deletion, revision, and addition, and thus, citing the reasoning of this judgment.
▣ 제1심판결 제3쪽 1행 ‘피고로부터’를 ‘청주공항관리로부터’로 수정 ▣ 제1심판결 제3쪽 5행 ‘13.’을 ‘14.’로 수정 ▣ 제1심판결 제4쪽에 아래에서 11행 내지 12행 ‘단, 매수인은 다음 각 호와 같은 출자자 지분요건을 정관에 규정하여야 한다.’를 삭제 ▣ 제1심판결 제6쪽 아래에서 1행 ‘을 제10, 11호증의 각 1, 2, 3의 각 기재’를 ‘을 제10호증의 1, 2, 3, 을 제11호증, 을 제12호증의 1, 2의 각 기재’로 수정 ▣ 제1심판결 제9쪽 6행 내지 7행 ‘대법원 2010. 12. 23. 선고 2010다56654 판결’ 다음에 ‘대법원 2013. 12. 26. 선고 2013다63257 판결, 대법원 2015. 12. 10. 선고 2014다14511 판결’을 추가
2. Judgment on the appellate court’s argument
A. As to the assertion that the contract is not a penalty agreement, the plaintiff asserts that Article 6 (6) of the sale contract of this case as indicated in the table is an expected agreement for damages, not a penalty agreement, inasmuch as the court decides that the sum of the contract deposit (2.5 million won and the proceeds of sale 2.55 billion won) and the contract deposit (2.55 billion won) shall be reverted to the defendant, the seller, at the time of cancellation of the contract for sale of airport operation rights due to the failure to pay the balance of the Cheongju Airport management (hereinafter "sale contract of this case").
Therefore, Article 398 (2) of the Civil Code provides that a contract shall be reduced in accordance with Article 398 (the proceeds of sale and the excess profit-sharing). 6 (the proceeds of sale and the excess profit-sharing)
The term "compact penalty" is used in the sale contract of this case.