However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 2012, the Defendant sent a female to work at a sexual traffic business establishment, along with B, to the head of the household, and recruited the female to work at “D” or “E”, which is a sexual traffic business establishment located in Australia C or its neighboring areas.

On November 2012, 2012, the Defendant explained F and G along with B at the coffee shop in the next department store of the department store, and B explained H and I around November 2012 about the operating method of the business of the family sex trafficking business establishments. B explained H and I around the end of 2012.

B From around that time to December 3, 2012, from that time, the Defendant sent the above F, I, H, and G to Australia, and the Defendant introduced and arranged the employment of the said F, G, and E to the said “D” by having the said F, G, and E employed the said I, H as a female sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. A copy of each police statement made to F, I, and J;

1. Copies of the entry or departure status of each individual;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of investigation report (a copy of G suspect interrogation protocol);

1. Article 19 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with labor for an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;