A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 200,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A: (a) from around 08:00 on September 1, 2013 to around 18, 2013, Defendant A set up a track on a road located in the 704-1, which is owned by the Defendant on the side of the racing-si, with a view to interfering with traffic by making it pass through the road traffic.

2. Defendant B: (a) from October 10, 2013 to October 07:0, 2013, the Defendant set up a shower car owned by the Defendant on the road located at the 3-3-704-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to A, B, E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each complaint, on-site photographs, investigation reports (information on investigation related to dividends), investigation reports (to be accompanied by telephone conversations of a suspect and attendance requests), investigation reports (to be accompanied by photograms of a suspect), investigation reports (to be accompanied by photograms of a suspect), investigation reports (to be accompanied by telephone conversationss and telephone conversationss with employees of the Gdong Office), investigation reports (to be accompanied by telephone conversationss and telephone conversationss of a victim), investigation reports (to be submitted) (to be submitted), investigation reports (to be submitted), investigation reports (to be called by the competent authorities of the Gdong Office, telephone conversationss and telephone conversationss, requests for appearance), investigation reports (information on investigation), criminal conciliation reports (Reports to ascertain the identity of a criminal conciliation commissioner), decisions (Article 2013Kahap173, Daegu District Court Decision 2007Do7380, reporting on phone calls of a victim);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ Selection of Punishment: Article 185 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: both types of punishment under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant A: Consideration that the period of crime was not shorter than the short, that is not good to the nature of the crime, and that is, however, that it has lived in a foreign country for a long time, and that it collects a track according to the court's decision;

2. Defendant B: The shorter period of crime, and Defendant A’s prior act was the cause of the crime.