소유권이전등기 등
1. As to real estate listed in the separate sheet:
A. The Defendants in the separate sheet No. 3, Defendant B, and Defendant B, respectively.
1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in the changed cause of claims; and
2. Grounds for recognition as to the defendant 1, 3 through 14, 16, 19, 20, 22 through 25, and 27 through 29: Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).
3. Grounds for recognition of defendants 15, 17, 18, 21, and 26: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).
4. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the claim against Defendant 2 argues that since AD, a registrant of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, is disqualified, both AD and Defendant Non-AFC (hereinafter “Defendant Non-AFFC”) are invalid. Accordingly, Defendant Non-AFC, on the premise that the Plaintiff’s claim was accepted on May 7, 2007, asserting that all documents for the procedure for cancellation of the right to collateral security had already been provided to the Plaintiff at the Plaintiff’s request on May 7, 2007. Therefore, there is no evidence to support that Defendant Non-AFC provided all documents for the procedure for cancellation of collateral security to the Plaintiff.
Therefore, Defendant Non-AFC is obligated to implement the registration procedures for cancellation of each registration of establishment of neighboring superficies completed by the Gwangju District Court No. 31414 on July 12, 1996 and the Gwangju District Court No. 314 on July 12, 1996.
5. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting it.