가수금 반환 청구
1. According to the Plaintiff’s amendment of the purport of the claim in the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.
The plaintiff.
1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, 11, 12, 15, 19 through 23 (in the case of additional numbers, including all of them; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, and 17, testimony of witness F of the first instance court, testimony of the first instance court, and the whole purport of the arguments in response to the order to submit financial transaction information to Daegu Bank on October 20, 2014.
The Defendant is a company established to run a business such as liquor wholesale business, and the Plaintiff was working in the Defendant Company since 2007 and was appointed as the inside director of the Defendant Company on March 11, 201, and was appointed as the representative director of the Defendant Company on August 8, 201, and on March 11, 2014, the term of office of the director and the representative director of the Defendant Company expired.
B. The Plaintiff had borrowed money from the Defendant Company at any time while working for the Defendant Company and received payment, and F, a director of the Defendant Company, lent money to the Defendant Company and received 1% interest thereon. The details are as follows.
1) The sum of the details of remittance and remittance received by the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff or his spouse to each account of the defendant company in the name of the plaintiff or his spouse is as listed in the following table, and the detailed details of each account shall be listed in the annexed table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "marks").
1) On the other hand, on the other hand, the sum of the amount transferred to the Defendant’s account is as follows: (a) the sum of the amount to be transferred to Plaintiff 327,30,000,484,000, Daegu Bank J. 1 Daegu Bank J. 2 Daegu Bank Co. 415,215,215,676,977,925,315 table 327,493,490,840 table; (b) the sum of the amount to be transferred to the Plaintiff 30,00,000,000,0000 won and 27,710,727,727,460,0000 won and 460 table 2: (c) the Plaintiff shall be the sum of the amount to be deducted to the Defendant Company; and (d) the Plaintiff’s new Bank No. 1653, Jul. 16, 2016; (d) the Plaintiff No.