beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.05.21 2015고정107

건축법위반등

Text

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 high-level 107] B is the owner of three units of housing on the land outside C and two parcels in the original city, and D is the owner of one unit of housing on the E one parcel in the original city in the original city, and the defendant is the owner of one unit of housing on the above ground and is the owner of B and D who has performed the new construction of housing upon delegation of all of the authority with respect to the new construction of housing on the above ground from the above B and D.

If a project owner intends to change any reported matter, he/she shall report it to the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu

1. On March 7, 2013, the Defendant newly constructed three houses with the first floor above the ground located on the original city C, F, and G land, and the Defendant moved 1.98 meters from the first reported location in a lump sum without filing a construction report to the original city Mayor, moved 3.02 meters from the original city, reduced the height of 3.02 meters from the total structure of the building to reinforced concrete.

2. On March 7, 2013, the Defendant newly constructed one story of ground located on the land E in the original city, and moved 1.98 meters from the original reported location without filing a construction report to the original city Mayor, reduced the height by 3.02 meters, and modified the total structure of the building from the steel frame to the reinforced concrete.

[2015, 2015, 231] Any person should obtain permission for competent viewing in order to engage in development activities.

Nevertheless, on June 2014, the Defendant, while engaging in the electric source housing development project on the land outside H and two lots outside the original city, did not obtain permission to change development activities, cut and filled up the area of 1296 square meters in total, and he stored the area of 130 square meters in the river area.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 107]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol on D or B;

1. A voluntary statement of the I;

1. A written accusation (2015 High Court Decision 231);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Voluntary statement of the public official in charge;