In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

A. A summary of the grounds for appeal 1) If the Defendant and the person who requested to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) consider that the Defendant’s mistake reflects the Defendant’s depth and constitutes a contingent crime, the lower court’s punishment (20 years of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.

2) In light of the fact that the nature of the instant crime committed by the prosecutor was extremely poor, that the Defendant was not able to repent, and that there was no compensation for damage to the bereaved family members of the victim, the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible and unreasonable.

B. The Defendant: (a) committed sexual traffic at the hotel hotel room with the victim, who is an employee of the main store, and (b) demanded more defects in sexual intercourses to the victim; (c) but (d) was refused from the victim, and (d) was killed of the victim’s head, face, and clothes.

The defendant tried to abandon the body of the victim by leaving the body of the victim into the sea without being boomed, and tried to take the body of the victim by taking the body over the body of the victim, and write and rhing both the body of the body of the body.

In light of the above circumstances, contents, and methods of the crime, the nature of each of the crimes of this case is extremely poor, and the result of the crime is very serious to the extent that it cannot be complied with.

In each of the crimes of this case, the victims and their bereaved families did not take any measures for the recovery of damage even though they suffered from the crowken, and the bereaved families want to take a severe punishment against the defendant.

The Defendant had a record of having been sentenced to imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in around 1993. Meanwhile, there is no record of any particular punishment before the instant case.

The above circumstances and the defendant appear to be against each of the crimes of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, family environment, etc., shall be comprehensively considered.