beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.03.17 2015가단21352

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On March 25, 2004, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff concluded a co-owned property partition contract with the network D, which is the mother of the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, on the instant real estate, etc. According to the above contract, the Plaintiff agreed to register the ownership transfer of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

The network D died on May 27, 2009, and the defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties jointly inherited the above real estate by one-six shares.

Therefore, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the partition of co-owned property on March 25, 2004 on the instant real property to the Plaintiff.

2. However, it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the net D entered into a co-owned property partition contract with the Plaintiff as the transfer cycle of the instant real estate by only the descriptions of evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 2-1-2, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.