2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim that C&E2, which is the Defendant’s agency (former trade name: C&T club; hereinafter “Non-Party Company”). The Plaintiff asserted that C&T is C&C, but it appears that C&T was written in the form of evidence No. 3-2, A, 10, 11, and 12 submitted by the Plaintiff, and “1)” was used as C&E62, which is the Defendant’s mobile phone fare system while the Plaintiff moved to and used as the Defendant for two years, the Plaintiff did not bear the first core chips and subscription fee, and the Plaintiff did not obtain the Plaintiff’s right to use the mobile phone in the name of Non-Party 6’s mobile phone (3.) with the Defendant’s resident registration certificate that the Plaintiff did not receive the Plaintiff’s new e-mail product under the above contract with the Defendant, and the Plaintiff did not receive the Plaintiff’s copy of the contract with the Defendant.