However, with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

【Defendant A, on December 23, 2015, was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on March 29, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 29, 2016

Defendant

B On November 18, 2015, the Busan District Court was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for six months for fraud, and the decision was finalized on November 26, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 Joint Defendant F (hereinafter “F”), and Defendant A F (hereinafter “F”), from September 2010 to January 15, 2013, run a mobile phone sales store with the trade name “H” from Gu and Si from Gu and Si from Gu and Si from January 15, 2013; Defendant A, who received the above H’s name from November 15, 2012 to January 15, 2013, was operated by the F.

The Defendant and F, while operating H as above, purchased personal information, such as a copy of the identification card under the name of the third party, using the Internet I Me, and conspired to prepare a new service contract using personal information, such as a copy of the identification card purchased from the third party, and to open the cell phone.

1. On December 3, 2012, the Defendant and F, in collusion with the Defendant and F related to the opening of the J-based mobile phone, intended to purchase personal information, such as a copy of the identification card under the Justice’s name and resident registration number, from the needy person using the Internet I Mes from the Defendant and F, the Defendant signed the K mobile subscription column “J”, “J resident registration number in the applicant column, and “J” in the applicant column, and forged the application for the K mobile subscription under the name of J, which is a private document regarding the rights and obligations, and subsequently, submitted the forged application for the joining of the J-based mobile phone to a non-employee of the K-based L-based mobile operator who may know of the fact that the application was duly established.

As a result, the defendant and F conspired to use them in the opening of the cell phone in the name of J, the defendant and F shall forge the application form in the name of J and, as such, by facsimile to employees who may not know the fact that it has been duly formed.