2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to two times to larceny, and four times of criminal punishment in fraud; (b) on February 14, 2014, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after having been sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to night residence intrusion larceny; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; (d) the Defendant did not recover from damage; and (e) the factors of disadvantageous sentencing, such as the crime committed; (c) the victim of larceny was not punished; and (d) the victim of larceny appears to have committed a crime for his livelihood; and (e) other favorable factors such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the scope of imprisonment (from April to August 10) the recommended sentencing guidelines, including the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of sentencing guidelines.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.