난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 20, 2017, the Plaintiff, as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”), entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status of tourism and Tong (B-2) (hereinafter “final entry”) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on July 25, 2017, but the Defendant decided to grant refugee status to the Plaintiff on February 25, 2016.
B. On August 1, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be recognized as “a sufficiently-founded fear of persecution,” as a requirement for refugee status.
C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 22, 2017, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the objection on March 21, 2018.
On April 16, 2018, the Plaintiff received a written decision to dismiss the said objection, and filed the instant lawsuit on July 11, 2018.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, Eul's 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff borrowed 90,000 Esp pounds from the natives, a member of the Unslateral Zone, and took part in several meetings of the Unslateral Zone in return for the Plaintiff’s exemption from the obligation to return the borrowed money from his natives. However, the Plaintiff refused to join the Unslateral Zone member, because he slickly took part in the illegal activities of Unslateral Zone.
Therefore, the members of the Muslim model group assaulted the plaintiff on the ground that the plaintiff did not join the Muslim model group.
There is a well-founded fear that if the plaintiff returned to Egypt, he would be disadvantaged by such reasons as above from the members of the Egypt Egypt.
B. The instant disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is lawful.
The reasons are as follows.
1. The plaintiff asserts as an object of promulgation.