However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 02:50 on November 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault with the victim C (38 years of age) who was committed on the front road of the Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) and (c) brought a dispute with the victim C (38 years of age); (d) by hand, the Defendant dumpeded the victim with the victim’s bomb, and assaulted the victim over the floor.

2. The Defendant was asked about personal information from the police officer E (the age of 51) of the Daegu Seongbuk Police Station D police box called the police officer at the time and place of the performance of official duties upon receiving a report as stipulated in paragraph (1) and at the time and place of the performance of official duties, and was assaulted by breath of the police officer’s breath by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and E;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;