beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.23 2014가단21245

수목수거 및 토지인도

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the [Attachment 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8, 200 m2, 184.4 m2 in Jeonju-si B, Jeonsan-gu, 184.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 5, 1987, the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of the Plaintiff on the ground of the sale on November 4, 1987 with respect to 188.4 square meters in Yansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si (hereinafter “the land No. 1”), and the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of the Defendant on the ground of the sale on November 24, 1994, with respect to 416.5 square meters in Yan-gu, Jeonsan-si, Jeonju-si (hereinafter “the land No. 2”). < Amended by Act No. 4813, Nov. 20, 1995>

B. Although the land No. 1 and the land No. 2 were adjoining each other, the Defendant owned the land No. 3.3 square meters in the ship connected each point of (i) part of (ii) 2.3 square meters in sequence with the land No. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 9 in sequence, among the land No. 1 and the land No. 2 as of April 2, 2015, which is the date of the closure of the argument in the instant case, the Defendant owned the land No. 3. 3 square meters in the ship (the sum of the land and the land No. 2.3 square meters in the instant case and the land No. 3.3 square meters in the order of 2.3 square meters in the ship (the sum of the land and the land No. 2. 3.3 square meters in the instant land).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the result of appraisal and the purport of the whole pleadings against the director before the North Korean Intellectual Property Center of this Court

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant, the owner of the instant land, is obligated to collect from the Plaintiff, who is the owner of the instant land, one glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, two glue tree, and two glue tree, and to deliver the land occupied

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.