A. From March 2015 to September 201 of the same year, Defendant L posted an advertisement stating that the sales right of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Mtel Ntel (hereinafter “instant officetel”) is discounted on the “Ntel”, which is a real estate information site.

B. Defendant L, who reported the above advertisement, stated to the effect that it is the representative of Defendant K, who is entitled to sell an officetel in lieu of payment in lieu of payment, on the part of the plaintiffs, who found the above advertisement, and himself is the owner of b&D city development (hereinafter “b&D”) of b&D, which is the owner of the instant officetel, and that it can purchase the right to sell in lots to the plaintiffs.

C. The Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract on the right to sell each of the instant officetels (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) with Defendant L who represented by Defendant K as follows, and paid the sales price to Defendant K, respectively.

Buyer 0. 0. 18, 200. 10, 10. 20. 20. 45, 50. 20. 10, 10. 20. 43, 500, 710. 7. 10. 40. 10, 10. 20. 15, 10. 7. 10. 10, 10. 205, 10. 40. 10, 10. 7. 10. 10, 205, 10. 205, 10. 7. 10, 204. 10, 205. 7. 10, 2005, 205. 7. 15, 2000, 30033, 1134. 8. 20, 2005