However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around September 30, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract with the LNG in charge of the purchase of the CBA car at the HNG in Ansan-si, and set up a mortgage on the above BB car as a mortgagee on October 5, 201, by purchasing the CBA car at the HNG in charge of the purchase of the CBA car, and at the same time, a mortgage was created on the above BBA as a collateral for the above loan.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million from a mutual non-performing credit service provider in Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was located in Gangnam-gu, and delivered the benz automobiles to the credit service provider as collateral and obstructed the exercise of the rights by the victim.

2. On February 22, 2012, the Defendant purchased the said truck from the HNG, and entered into a contract for a loan of KRW 80,000,000 with the victim’s KNG, and around February 24, 2012, established a mortgage on the said truck as a mortgagee, as a collateral for the said loan.

On January 2013, the Defendant borrowed KRW 15 million from a mutual infinite credit service provider in Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and delivered the said truck to the credit service provider as collateral and obstructed the exercise of the victim’s rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application agreement for a debate on errors in installment financing, and the register of automobiles statutes;

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act shall be taken into consideration, such as the fact that the defendant

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;