However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

In addition, the claimant for the observation order for protection (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is the victim C (24 years of disability, delay disability 2 level), victim D (nive, intellectual disability 1 level), and the mother of the victim C (nive, 21 years of age, intellectual disability 1 level).

The Defendant, due to the disability, was unable to adapt to society due to the victim, received from the people around the society, and faced with difficulties in living due to the lack of economic circumstances, and attempted to kill the victims with exempted money and commit suicide.

On June 21, 2017, at around 12:45, the Defendant prepared about 10 eggs of water exemption in the Dong-gu Dong-gu E-Ba 101, Daegu Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, 101; first, he saw the victims to drink 4 eggs of water exemption and 2 eggs of water exemption exemption; first, he saw the victims to sleep; first, he saw the victims to drink 4 eggs of water exemption; first, he saw the victims to sleep 19 of the victim's head; second, he tried to kill the victims by using the parts of head of the victim D at one time, which are dangerous goods inside the house. However, the Defendant failed to report the victim's behavior to the victim D on the two skins, etc. of the number of days of treatment; second, the victim C, who thought the Defendant's behavior, failed to report the victim's 19,000 kn't 19,000 kn't k.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to kill victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to C and F;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. The wife of a victim and the image of the suspect taken at the scene;

1. A medical certificate and a medical opinion;

1. Application of each appraisal response statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 254 and 250 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Article 10(2) and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of mental and physical weakness (this Court)