beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.07.07 2016고정6

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of Csi and a victim D (18 years old) who was on board the above taxi.

On October 20, 2015, around 11:15, the Defendant: (a) in front of the name of the university located in 316 at Seocheon-si University, the Defendant: (b) caused the injury to the victim, by putting on the part of the part of the body that requires approximately two-day medical treatment on his hand, while communicating with the victim as to whether the Defendant was found by leaving the cab by the Defendant; (c) the victim was able to fright the part of the victim with his her son; (d) the victim’s son was flick; (d) the victim was flick with his son, and (e) the son was flick with his son’s hand, thereby damaging the victim’s left part of the body that requires approximately two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of black stay images), an investigation report (verification of black stay images), and an investigation report (Attachment of documents verifying the details of medical treatment);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of an invoice of medical expenses incurred in outpatient medical expenses and a copy thereof;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of denial of the fact of injury: “The Defendant and his defense counsel did not flick the victim’s shoulder, but did not flick the victim’s shoulder or see the victim’s shoulder, and even if the Defendant had flicked the victim’s neck, the Defendant committed an injury by merely flicking the victim’s upper part to the extent that natural healing could occur.

I asserted that “no matter can be found.”

However, in full view of the detailed and consistent statements of the victim, consistent statements of witnesses E, black stuff images, and the parts and degree of the upper body, etc., the defendant is trying to see the victim's timber.