A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered to the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person driving with a G 24 tons of cargo vehicles owned by him, G 24 tons of cargo vehicles in the F Co., Ltd. at the time of racing, and Defendant B is the representative of the F Co., Ltd., and the victim H(66) is a worker of the said company.

1. At around October 29, 2013, Defendants A, occupationally killed, Defendant A, at the place of business of the above FFF FFF, was repairing a string engine that enables the loading of the cargo vehicle to operate the next door of the loading of the vehicle with the victim, as the next door of the loading of the vehicle did not normally rise.

At the time, since the loading of the cargo does not work properly and the repair is carried out in the state of loading the cargo by using the stack driven by the victim, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents that may occur far away from the lower parts of the vehicle by taking safety measures to prevent the occurrence of accidents in advance in preparation for the cases where the fluence of the fluor on the fluor is lowered.

In addition, Defendant B, before the victim’s work is in progress, required to provide safety caps to workers who are in danger of falling or dangerous to prevent safety accidents, or who are in danger of falling by workers, and did not take all such measures despite the duty of care to educate safety rules, etc. in advance.

In addition, as seen above, Defendant A performed repair work without putting the vehicle loaded adjacent to the broken vehicle, and by negligence neglecting what the victim left the front of the vehicle loaded, Defendant A her head was covered by the victim H’s head, who was on the lower side of the vehicle, left away from the lower side of the vehicle.

In the end, it is eventually.