However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 15, 2013, at around 08:45, the Defendant interfered with business, who was taking care of and was receiving medical treatment from the 119 first-aid department on the grounds that the bridge around the C Hospital emergency department and the clinic department in Jung-gu, Seoul and the hospital department and the hospital room in Jung-gu, Seoul had the employees, such as nurses D, without any reason under the influence of alcohol, she told the victim C Hospital employees, including the nurse D, to take a bath, such as “trings and two-years,” and obstructed the victim C hospital’s emergency room and receiving department by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 30 minutes.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer on the maintenance of order, such as questioning the police officer “whether he gets treated, is returned home, or is returned home,” who was called out after having received 112 reports at the parking lot of the above hospital, and committing assaulting the police officer on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to G and F

1. Relevant Article 136(1) and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although there are many criminal records of the same or similar kind of application of the law under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the extent of damage cannot be determined as much as possible, in consideration of the fact that an agreement is reached with the victim C Hospital, the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed in a contingency under the influence of alcohol, and the reflectivity, etc.