2. The judgment of the court below is that even though the defendant's mistake is recognized in full, it seems that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in distress while under the influence of alcohol, and that the degree of assault committed by police officers is not severe. Although the amount acquired through the fraud of this case is relatively small, the defendant has already been punished by a fine for the same crime, and the defendant has committed each of the crimes of this case after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, even though it was caused by a criminal act different from each of the crimes of this case, but he was sentenced to imprisonment and completed the execution during the period of repeated offense, and the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties of this case is a crime that undermines the function of the State, and there is a need to strictly punish it, and considering various circumstances such as the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., the judgment of the court below is unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.