특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 8, 2014, the Defendant driven B le-car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.149% at the 4km section from the 4km section above the Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong Gyeong-dong (hereinafter “Am-dong”) around 19:39 on June 8, 2014.
2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of the victim C, etc. in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents).
On June 8, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car and proceeded with the Anng-dong Agricultural Cooperative located in the Andong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, but the Rotro Twit distance intersection from the north bank of the Young-gu-dong-dong-dong-dong-
At the time, since it is at night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly prevent accidents by thoroughly manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive under the influence of alcohol as set forth in Paragraph 1, and was driven by the victim C (Woo, 39 years old) who was under a stop for the signal atmosphere at the front of the Defendant, and was driven by the victim D(14 years old), E (n, 8 years old) and followed the FSP car, which was on board, and received as the front part of the said ASP car.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C and D, such as light salt in need of treatment for each two-day period, and suffered injury to the victim E, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said spke car to the extent that it damages KRW 393,000 for repair cost, and without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.
3. On June 8, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act against the Victim G (SP) in relation to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (SP) at the time when the Defendant was able to flee by driving the said leisure car at around 19:39, as prescribed in paragraph (2).