도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BMW 520d car.
1. On November 30, 2019, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a section of about 3km from the Do in front of the area of the river in which the blood alcohol concentration is 0.132% under the influence of alcohol around November 30, 2019, to the 3km road in front of the area of the river in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.
2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the four-lane way in front of the sphere C at the time of the temporary border as described in paragraph (1) and was driving the said vehicle in a two-lane.
At the time, night and there are four lanes, so in such cases, when there is a concern that a person engaged in driving service may impede normal traffic of other vehicles running in the direction of the change, the course shall not be changed, and in advance, there was a duty of care to operate a direction direction, etc. in order to give notice of change of course and to prevent accidents by safely changing the lane in the direction of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, while the Defendant changed the course from the two-lane to the three-lane in order to stop and resist the said taxi due to the Echip taxi driving method in the victim D (Nam, 54 years old) that was driving in the four-lanes of the above Part, the Defendant stated that the part of the above chip taxi in front of the left side of the said chip taxi and the facts charged in the subsequent part of the pentp are stated as having received the above chip vehicle's right side and the subsequent part of the facts charged, but according to the evidence, the fact that the Defendant received the above chip vehicle's back part and the subsequent part of the pentp is recognized as "the rear side part and the subsequent part of the pentp."
was received as such.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., by occupational negligence, to the victim D, F (ma, 54 years old), G (ma, 55 years old), and H (ma, 54 years old), each of which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.