전자금융거래법위반
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower judgment against the Defendants is unreasonable as it is too unfasible to this point of view. The lower court’s respective sentences (one year of imprisonment, two years of probation, observation of protection, confiscation, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for six months, one year of suspended sentence, one year of suspended sentence, and one
2. The instant crime is an act of taking over a financial institution’s access to the media, and such access media may be abused for the singinginging and money laundering crimes, etc. However, in light of the fact that the Defendants were erroneous and contradictory to the Defendants, the Defendants did not have the same criminal record, the Defendants’ support for the wife and her children, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s each punishment against the Defendants is too minor.
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.