When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 26, 2013, at around 23:20, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the proprietor before the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 102 Dong 1101, and was called out, and (b) took a bath to the address of the Plaintiff, “the scambling shall go to his address”; (c) the Defendant assaulted the police officer in the process of performing official duties, such as the scambing of the scam, and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties, and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the scams, tensions, and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties, the crimes of injury, and the punishment imposed on more severe injury);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not limited to obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the nature of the crime is weak. However, even though the defendant later led to his injury to a police officer, all of the crimes of this case are led to his confessions and repents. The defendant does not have any previous criminal records other than the fine before about 30 years for the crime of this case, and the defendant has no other criminal records. The defendant is a person with a physical disability of class 4, which is very difficult to economic situation. The crime of this case appears to be an contingent crime committed by the defendant under the influence of alcohol, and other circumstances such as the defendant's character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the order.