beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.09.14 2016가단259909

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(c) comply with the provisions of the Trade Regulations;

(3) No member who uses the guarantee of electronic commerce security of the Guarantee Agency (Korea Technology Finance Corporation, etc.) and the B2B transactions based on the guarantee of electronic commerce loans shall engage in any of the following unfair transactions prohibited by the Guarantee Agency:

1. Fraudulent transactions in which funds are settled without actual transactions of goods or services;

(4) If a member makes a settlement of the purchase fund with a financial institution's loans or receives such settlement as a selling enterprise through an unfair trading act set forth in the preceding three paragraphs, the member shall be liable to the guarantor and the company for the compensation for damages and the return of unjust enrichment arising from the unfair trading.

On December 30, 2013, the Defendant Company ordered H-BAM 300*300 products to the Defendant Company on December 30, 2013. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant Company issued 30,000 won of steel materials H-BAM 300*150 products. On December 31, 2013, 2013, the Defendant Company received the consent of 10,487,950 won of the price of the goods, and completed the issuance of 00,000 won of the said goods on December 31, 2013, 200 won of the price of the said goods, 30,000 won of the said goods, 10,000 won of the price of the goods, 10,000 won of the said goods, 301,01,000 won of the sales contract on the said goods.

3) However, on January 6, 2014, Hanho-ethyl cancelled the order of the above order, and the Defendant Company issued a Maspher tax invoice on January 6, 2014, and cancelled the order to Hyundai Steel. 4) The Defendant Company’s Naspethyl on January 3, 2014, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 12173, Jan. 3, 2014>