손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Basic facts
A. The deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”) was a worker working at H (hereinafter “instant workplace”) operated by Defendant G, and Defendant F was also a worker working at the instant workplace.
B. On January 1, 2014, the Deceased and Defendant F returned to the toilet while working in the instant workplace. Defendant F completed the first day and returned to the workplace. However, the Deceased was confined for about 20 minutes on the wind outside the toilet door and returned to the workplace late.
Since then, the Deceased asked Defendant F to “I am out of the above toilet door,” and there was a question about Defendant F’s “I am out of the toilet.”
(hereinafter “instant toilet accident”). C.
However, at around 15:40 on January 15, 2014, the Deceased complained for the answer of the answer while working in the instant workplace, and was sent back to the hospital by drinking her chest, and continued hospitalized treatment after being sent back to the hospital, but was eventually killed in cerebral flac. D. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2547, Sep. 24, 2014>
On the other hand, there are plaintiffs C, D, and E, who are the husband of the deceased, and their children.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 7 evidence, witness I's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment
A. (1) After the Plaintiffs’ assertion that the instant toilet accident occurred, Defendant F continued to duplicate the Deceased, who dupliced the Deceased, and dupliced the Deceased on January 15, 2014, the Defendant F said that he would incur a trial cost to the Deceased, and that “not later than the time he was dead.”
Accordingly, the deceased's deep shock and the blood pressure increased, and thus, it was used in brain color.
(2) Ultimately, the Deceased died due to Defendant F’s continuous harassment. As such, Defendant F is liable to compensate for damages arising therefrom.
(3) Meanwhile, Defendant G was aware of the fact that Defendant F was bullying from time to time as an employer who employs Defendant F.