2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and against whom all of the crimes of this case are committed, a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance is subscribed, and the injured party does not want to be punished against the defendant by agreement with the victim.

However, due to the instant accident, the victim suffered an injury requiring 6 weeks' medical treatment, and thereafter escaped without taking any measures, even though there was a serious damage to the victim's vehicle to the extent that it would be scrapped, the victim lost his mind without getting out of the vehicle. Due to the instant accident, there was a risk that the victim could suffer a serious damage due to the second accident, the victim's alcohol concentration at the time of the instant accident was 0.154%, and the driving distance was 5km, and the driving distance was 5km, and the defendant had already been punished as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (overage) and the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, circumstances of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., were considered to be the conditions of the sentencing of this case, and thus, the above assertion by the court below is unreasonable and reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.