beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.06.05 2015고단377

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months in Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court to a violation of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Offenders, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gangnam Prison on June 11, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 11, 2014, the Defendant was released from the Gangnam Prison and was in bad credit standing with no certain occupation. On July 31, 2014, the Defendant living together with AC suffering from brain disease, mental retardation, external stress disorder, mixed uneasiness disorder, etc. on Grade 3 intellectual disability around July 31, 2014. In fact, the Defendant used AC in the name of AC and received mobile phone opening with the victim’s mother, and received various money under the pretext of AC’s trust. On August 2014, 2014, the mother of AC, who was in operation 109, had the victim AJ, living together with the victim, and married with AC, and had the victim believe that the victim and the victim reliance reliance by marriage with AC, as if he/she had no intention to marry with AC.

1. On August 22, 2014, around August 22, 2014, the Defendant stated to the Victim AJ that “AJ (around August 22, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the business of operating his/her punishment and clothes together, and that he/she was aware of the funeral service and sought to contact with him/her. In order to send inventory goods to the head office, the Defendant may receive a refund of KRW 10 million of the insurance amount that he/she paid prior to the payment of the deposit when paying the deposit amount of KRW 4 million.” Accordingly, the Defendant borrowed KRW 4 million immediately.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a certain occupation and did not have any property under his own name, and was in a bad credit position due to the default of mobile phone charges, and was working as an employee at the sales store of clothes and was merely an employee, and was not directly operated under his/her own clothes. This is the above.