If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On October 15, 201, the Defendant of defamation, around 17:00 on October 15, 201, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts, even though the victim H embezzled public funds to the Senior Citizens Association, even though the victim H did not have embezzled.

2. On October 17, 2011, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out 20 persons, such as at the same place as before and after October 17, 2011, where there are 20 persons, such as the above D, etc., at the same time as before and after the former paragraph. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23284, Oct. 17, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 25035, Oct. 17, 2011>

3. On October 18, 2011, the Defendant of defamation damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by sound, among 20 persons, at the same place as paragraph (1) on October 18, 2011, including the above D around 11:00, and at the same time, 20 persons, including the above D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, D, G, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of patrol place;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.