If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in daily work, B is a company member, and the victim C is a person who operates the Nam-gu Dnoman shop in Ulsan-gu. Around 00:30 on May 25, 2012 in collusion with B, the Defendant had the same attitude as paying the price even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price by drinking and eating, and the Defendant had the same attitude as he/she would have paid the price to the victim even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price. This was ordered by two orders of 160,000, 160,000 won of the market price, by taking advantage of entertainment with the victim, and by failing to pay the price.

2. The defendant's date, time, and place

A. As the Defendant did not pay the price as above, the victim’s public insultd the victim by openly referring to the victim’s 15 minutes in light of the following: (a) the victim’s Hamsan Police Station E District of the Ulsannam Police Station: F, who was dispatched by the above C’s report, to the victim: (b) the victim’s 15 minutes of 15 minutes of “Imn't dume dume dume; (c) the hume dume dume dume dume; and (d) the victim’s hume dume dume dume dume

B. When the above F requires the Defendant to accompany the Defendant to the earth, it threatened the Defendant, who is a public official, by threatening the above F, to be a beer and beer in a room room.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the accused, B, or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and C;

1. Articles 347(1), 30, 311, and 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the corresponding legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.