In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. Defendant B: (a) was a person engaged in food manufacturing and processing business that manufactures and processes rice rice, and (b) was a person engaged in food manufacturing and processing business, and (c) a food manufacturing and processing business operator, despite having prepared documents relating to the place of production and work and documents pertaining to raw material consumption for the storage, delivery, and use of raw materials, he/she violated the code of practice to be observed by the business operator by preparing all products as if all products were produced as rice and processed rice and processed rice and processed rice and processed rice with rice and processed with rice and processed with rice in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon; (d) from November 1, 2014 to February 18, 2016, the distribution period of the above D is imminent and returned to the selling business; and (e) returned rice and processed rice and processed rice with rice and processed rice and produced new products

2. The above B, who is an employee of the defendant A, violated the defendant's duty as described in the above Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. On-site photographs, ctv image photographs, sales inventory records by product, rice mills supply and return specifications, rice rice mills supply and return specifications (H), each raw material receipt-related documents, entries in the G pocket book, descriptions on reuse and production of rice mills by date, business registration certificates, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to business registration certificates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and subparagraph A of the option of punishment: Defendant B of Articles 100, 97 subparag. 6, and 42(1) of the Food Sanitation Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14022, Feb. 3, 2016); Article 97 subparag. 6, and Article 42(1) of the Food Sanitation Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14022, Feb. 3, 2016);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above, each of the provisional payment orders;